Are Biofuels the Answer or Just Another Boondoggle?

Biofuel
Observing our collective reaction to rising gas prices, it’s clear to me how we got into this mess in the first place. Are humans incapable of looking any further ahead than tomorrow? Do we only care about ourselves? Are we the dumbest, most short-sighted animals on the planet? I hate to say it, but, “Yes, YES, YES.”

First, there was that whole gas-tax holiday gambit championed by old man McCain and Hillary Clinton. Two days ago, McCain jumped on the idea of overturning the 26-year-old ban on offshore drilling in this country, a glaring reversal from his previous position on the matter. A day later, Bush chimed in that he thought it was a good idea, which is all the evidence you need to know that it isn’t. I’m not even going to mention all the environmental damage such a move would cause. Nor am I going to harp on our infantile desire to keep things just the way they are (“I’m going to be driving this Suburban when I’m 95!”) when nature constantly shows us that everything is in flux. No, this plan doesn’t even make sense economically. A 2004 study by the Energy Information Administration found that drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge would trim the price of gas by a mere 3.5 cents a gallon by 2027.

Another option I keep hearing about is using biofuels to run our cars. A bunch of companies (one is Sapphire Green in San Diego, another is Valcent Products in El Paso) are trying to convert certain strains of algae into fuel. This is fairly exciting in that algae doesn’t need fresh water to grow, and the carbon dioxide it needs to grow might possibly offset all the carbon dioxide it releases when used as fuel. But it still seems like a stop-gap measure when what we desperately need is a paradigm shift, an entirely new way of thinking as we enter a new era in our history.

As thrilling as using algae as fuel might be to some, I still don’t understand why we love our cars so much. What good have they done for our culture? They’re expensive, dangerous, and socially isolating. Sure, they’re an ideal spot to fool around with the opposite sex when you’re a teenager, but beyond that they’re just rapidly depreciating death traps. I still think we’d be better off in the long run just ditching them and fully embracing public transportation. To help people in Austin make that choice, Capital Metro is offering “Xtreme Transit Makeovers,” specific advice about which routes to take for commuting and other trips, as well as handing out free seven-day bus passes from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. today at 100 Congress Ave.

Tags: , , ,

2 Responses to “Are Biofuels the Answer or Just Another Boondoggle?”

  1. Storms Says:

    In today’s Austin Statesman there’s an article about how bad traffic is on I-35. Highlighting the uphill battle public transportation faces, here’s one reader’s response to the story:
    “I don’t care how bad the traffic is (and it’s really not that bad), I will never take public transportation with all of those smelly, homeless eco-nazis blathering on about global warming and carbon footprints. Public transportation, just like any guv’ment endeavor preceded by the word public, is just another lame attempt at equalizing society - aka communism. You can have my Silverado when you pry the keys from my cold, dead fingers.”
    Sigh.

  2. Jen Says:

    Good Lord. Did someone really say that? Or am I hallucinating?
    And while I’m not a fan of the idea that biofuels or “alternative” energy sources are going to get us out of this mess, I’d definitely take algae over corn any day, considering the return you theoretically get for the input. If only to power those busses full of eco-nazis?
    (And cold, dead fingers mean one less Silverado driver. Is that so bad? God I’m horrible.)

Leave a Reply